Towards a Critical Realist Epistemology for Blockchain Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59952/jmcfrf80Keywords:
Blockchain, Critical realism, Interpretivism, Positivism, Information Systems, Research MethodologyAbstract
Although the transformative power of blockchain technology in the context of various global governance frameworks has been widely noted, the emergence of blockchain as an Information System (IS) artifact remains poorly supported by the consolidated and robust epistemological framework. This paper fills the gap by critically evaluating the blockchain technology using the lenses of the three main IS research paradigms: positivism, interpretivism, and critical theory. This paper suggests that while the former paradigm provides a great opportunity to model the deterministic and immutable aspects of blockchain as an object, and the latter – to explore the subjective views of human actors, neither of them independently takes into consideration the complex interaction of the sociotechnical processes that accompany blockchain implementation. Therefore, it is proposed to adopt the philosophical approach of Critical Realism (CR), combining the epistemological perspectives of CR and the process-based research approach outlined by J.D. Roode.
References
Adams, D., Nelson, R., & Todd, P. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of
information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227–247.
Ahituv, N., & Neumann, S. (1982). Principles of information systems for management.
WCB.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes.
Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261–277.
Bahga, A., & Madisetti, V. K. (2017). Blockchain applications: a hands-on approach.
VPT.
Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Empirical research in information systems: The
practice of relevance. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 3–16.
Benton, T., & Craib, I. (2001). Philosophy of social science: the philosophical foundations
of social thought. Palgrave.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: a treatise in the
sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.
Bhaskar, R. (2024). The possibility of naturalism: a philosophical critique of the
contemporary human sciences (4th ed.). Routledge.
Bhutta, M. N., Khwaja, A., Nadeem Al Hassan, A., Ahmad, H., Khan, K., Hanif, M., &
Cao, Y. (2021). A survey on blockchain technology: Evolution, architecture and security. IEEE Access, 9, 1–1.
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2001). Business research methods. Oxford University Press. Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust,
innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–26. Checkland, P., & Holwell, S. (1998). Information, systems and information systems:
making sense of the field. John Wiley and Sons.
Chen, L., Gillenson, M., & Sherrell, D. (2002). Enticing online consumers: An extended
technology acceptance perspective. Information and Management, 39(8), 705–
719.
Cresswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8),
982–1003.
Doll, W., Hendrickson, A., & Deng, X. (1998). Using Davis's perceived usefulness and
ease-of-use instruments for decision making: A confirmatory and multi-group invariance analysis. Decision Sciences, 29(4), 839–869.
Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., & Howell, J. M. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley.
Fitzgerald, B., & Howcroft, D. (1998). Competing dichotomies in IS research and possible strategies for resolution. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on
Information Systems (ICIS), 155-164.
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An
integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.
Hussey, J., & Hussey, R. (1997). Business Research: A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students. Macmillan
Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2017). The truth about blockchain. Harvard Business
Review, 95(1), 118–127.
Mannheim, K. (1997). Structures of thinking. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. (1973). A program for research in management information
systems. Management Science, 19(5), 475–487.
Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W. (2001). Extending the technology acceptance
model: The influence of perceived user resources. DATA BASE for Advances in
Information Systems, 32(3), 86–112.
Mingers, J. (2001). Combining IS research methods: Towards a pluralist methodology.
Information Systems Research, 12(3), 240–259.
Mingers, J. (2004). Realizing information systems: Critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems. Information and Organization, 14(2), 87–103.
Monethi, T. R. (2023). Is Africa ready to join the blockchain revolution: A feasibility study. Perspectivas: Journal of Political Science, 29, 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.21814/perspectivas.4634
Monod, E. (2004). Einstein, Heisenberg, Kant: Methodological distinction and conditions
of possibilities. Information and Organization, 14(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1471-7727(04)00018-1
Nakamoto, S. (2018). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: a comprehensive introduction. Princeton University
Press.
Nidhieaswar, S. (2023). Internet technology: Blockchain. International Journal of
Research Publication and Reviews, 4(4), 4864–4865.
Phillips, D. C., & Burbules, N. C. (2000). Postpositivism and educational research.
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Piccardo, G., Conti, L., & Martino, A. (2024). Blockchain technology and its potential to
benefit public services provision: A short survey. Future Internet, 16(8), 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16080290
Preston, A. M. (1991). The ‘Problem’ in and of management information systems.
Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 1(1), 43–69.
Reyan, M. Z., & Twinomurinzi, H. (2023). Blockchain technology in lands registration: A systematic literature review. JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 15(1), 1-22.
Roode, J. (1993). Implications for teaching of a process-based research framework for
information systems. Proceedings of the International Academy for Information
Management, 1-12.
Turban, E., McLean, E., & Wetherbe, J. (1996). Information technology for management:
improving quality and productivity. John Wiley & Sons.
Vardan, J., & Hovik, G. (2025). The use of smart contracts in public administration (using the example of the Republic of Armenia). Research Center ALTERNATIVE.
Wang, Y.-S. (2003). The adoption of electronic tax filing systems: An empirical study.
Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 333–352.
Weber, R. (2004). Editors comments: The rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: A
personal view. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), iii–xiii.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nooseli Moses, Gabriel Okello, Paul Okanda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.